GCI's effort to address the reality of climate change began in earnest in 1990. The defining purpose has been since then, to turn a global-problem into a global-solution. We established the non-ideological Contraction & Convergence (C&C) methodology to this end, gradually attracting much support for this.
The effort - that continues until the present day 28/09/2019 - embraces this record 1989-2010: -
Already moved by the Penang Manifesto of 1989 and realising the enormity of the climate crisis,
"Save the Forest Save the Planet" (what would become GCI a year later) devised
a founding statement based
on the precautionary principle of Equity & Survival.
At the 2nd World Climate Conference in November 1990, the UN began to create the Framework Convention on Climate Change [UNFCCC].
The Global Commons Institute [GCI] would be founded in 1991. However, with particular respect to Messrs Bach, Koomey & Krause, we issued this statement to the Conference.
In June 1992 the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was agreed at the Earth Summit in Rio. The UNFCCC objective
is stabilizing the rising greenhouse gas [GHG] concentration in the global atmosphere. Its principles of equity & precaution were established in international law.
GCI also created the methodology of the 'Contraction and Convergence' (C&C) calculating model. Guided by early output from the 'Berne Climate Model', the carbon-budget-integral methodology of C&C takes the Global Per Capita Average of emissions arising, as the organising standard for joint/several global emissions accounting for UNFCCC-Compliance.
In March 1997, at the COP inter-sessional the Government of the USA asked GCI for support based on GCI's interpretation of the Byrd Hagel Resolution. As a result of giving this support, the US & Chinese Governments asked GCI to visit and try to recruit support for C&C. This was done during June & July 1997.
China State Counsellor Dr Song Jian, pre-COP 3 1997, “When we ask the opinions of people from all circles, many people, in particular the scientists, think the emissions control
standard should be formulated on a per capita basis.
According to the UN Charter, everybody is born equal & has inalienable rights to enjoy modern technological civilization.”
In November 1997 Meyer/GCI/C&C received the Andrew Lees Memorial Award, the British Environment Media Award"Aubrey Meyer, almost single-handedly
and with minimal resources, has made an extraordinary impact on the negotiations on the Climate Change Treaty, one of the most important of our time."
In December 1997, a C&C-based way-ahead was debated in the final session of COP-3,
with strong interest from India, China the Africa Group the USA. The USA stated, "C&C contains elements for the next agreement that we may ultimately all seek to engage in."
Al Gore showed up at the last minute asking the Europeans to cut their emissions contraction committment of 15% off by 2005 to 7.5%, in the full knowledge that if they did it, it would still go straight in the White House bin as the US Senate would still throw it out as LDCs were still left out. It took him another ten years to get it.
GCI asked HMG to support that emerging consensus.
A UK delegate (& member of the 'Green Globe Taskforce') said, "we know its right, but we can't and we won't." This is noteworthy, only because ten years later, the UK would make C&C the basis of the UK Climate Act, in what they claimed (& still claim)
as 'global leadership'.
Influenced by Sir John Houghton, in 2000, the UK's Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP) adopts C&C in its Climate Energy Report. It was to become a widely
quoted & path-steering reference, as this report made C&C the key policy-recommendation to the UK Government & this defined the debate leading to the UK Climate Act in 2008.
In July 2000, the
RCEP Chairman Sir Tom Blundell wrote a letter saying how much the RCEP valued GCI's pioneering work over the years making the case for 'Contraction & Convergence', adding this had enabled them to develop their own arguments more effectively.
In 2000 at COP-6 the Insurers led by GCNU laid out the whole argement
In September 2002 the Minister of the Environment Michael Meacher wrote to GCI acknowledging, "the need to protect the integrity of the C&C argument." In 2003 DEFRA published a memo, "building on the work of the RCEP which used a Contraction and Convergence methodology developed by GCI."
An Archive of some of the items from these early years (1989-2004) is here A selection of significant international support for C&C is here and here
“The notions of the right to climate protection or climate security of future generations and of shared responsibilities in a common world can be combined to assert that, collectively, we have the right only to emit some very small amount of GHGs, equal for all, and that no-one has the right to emit beyond that level without incurring the duty to compensate. We are therefore obliged to pay for the right to emit above that common level.
This can be seen as an argument in favour of the ‘contraction and convergence’ proposition, whereby ‘large emitters’ should contract emissions and all individuals in the world should either converge to a common (low) level or pay for the excess (and those below that level could sell rights)." Source Contraction and Convergence (C&C) is the science-based global climate policy framework proposed to the UN since 1990 by GCI
An archive of developments till 2009 is here. Work in Whitehall & Parliament & its Committees and around the world (2000-2007).
This included numerous reports by Parliamentary Select Committees repeatedly advocating C&C to the UK government.
In 2009, Adair Turner, then Chairman of UK Climate Change
Committee,
said in HoC that C&C is the basis of the UK Climate Act (UKCA): -"In the UK Climate Act we have
endorsed the C&C principle.
Its pretty strong support for what Aubrey Meyer has said. we didn't call it that - it became emotive for reasons I don't really understand."
(Looking at Assumptions here might help understanding statements of this nature) . . .
"We believe that it is difficult to imagine a global deal which allows the developed countries
to have emissions per capita in 2050 which are significantly above a sustainable global average."
" . . . if for reasons of urgency the overall contraction rate had to be accelerated,
the convergence rate would have to be accelerated relative to that . . . "
"He is a good gentleman. He's been on this issue for years and he's not giving up.
If we had all been as strong as Aubrey we would have achieved very high levels."