2009 - The charge was made recently that the C&C Proposal, "does not stipulate the speed at which it must occur, which is clearly the central question to be answered."
It is the central question to be answered but the charge does not stick. Over the last twenty years, GCI has arguably made more effort than any other agency in the entire UNFCCC-process to elucidate, answer and communicate answers to this point about the rates of C&C that are required for UNFCCC-compliance and so show how negotiators at the UNFCCC can be assisted to come to an effective global agreement. This inevitably requires solving the problem faster than we are creating it - quite a challenging thing to conceive and to communicate and certainly a challenging thing to achieve.
A few examples of GCI's efforts on this question follow
NB the analysis animation immediately was present to the EAC Enuiries in 2009.
Viewing this the UKMO, claimed that GCI did not undertand the carbon cyle.
However, it simply illustrates what is in UKMO's spread sheets of the UK Climate Act.
So if a lack of understanding is the issue, they were taking issue with their own work.
Presentation/animation: An assessment of 'Contraction & Concentrations'
and 'Contraction &
Convergence' and the C&C targets and modelling behind
various rates of
'sink-efficiency' in the UK Government's 'Climate Act' [2008].
Also for 'download and save' as a self-executing
PC file here
*************************************************************
Spreadsheet based on Government spreadsheets with GCI Chart visible below: - added 2020
The methodology for weighing concentration-projections & comparing these with the carbon-budget is straightforward
Presentation/animation puts C&C in the context of IPCC AR4 [2007] and the so-called
'coupled-carbon-cycle'
modelling
reported quantitatively for the first time since IPCC FAR 1990.
Essentially, due to 'positive feedback' effects in the carbon cycle, where rising temperature
amplifies the rate at which atmospheric GHG concentration increases, accelerated rates of
carbon emissions contraction are needed to meet a given concentration outcome. This is
the increasingly crucial issue of changing rates of 'Sink-efficiency'. In depth analysis of this
in relation to the UK Climate Act is here.
Presentation/animation: used at the RIBA Summit [2006] Venice.
In the context-overview at: - Acceptable Dangerous Impossible Risk overview, the Acceptable [C1] Dangerous [C2] Impossible [C3] Rates of C&C animated here and this supports the short article at: - Climate Action book 2007 C&C discussed in more detail here: - C&C_Chapter_Levene_Book_.pdf
Presentation/animation: used at the RIBA Summit [2006] Venice.
In the context-overview at Acceptable Dangerous Impossible Risk
the Acceptable [C1] Dangerous [C2] Impossible [C3] Rates of C&C
animated here and this supports the short article
Climate Action book 2007 C&C discussed in more detail here
The rates for Contraction:Concentrations and Contraction:Convergence
are compared in this animation as: -
Acceptable [C1]
Dangerous [C2]
Impossible [C3]
Rates of C&C at four different theoretical rates of sink-failure.
A few more examples of GCI's effort ranging over the last fifteen years follow: -
http://www.gci.org.uk/animations/C&C_COP_15.swf
http://www.gci.org.uk/animations/C1_C2_C3_animations.exe
http://www.gci.org.uk/animations/C1,C2,C3.swf
http://www.gci.org.uk/C&C_Animation.exe
http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/C&CSlideshow_notes.pdf
http://www.gci.org.uk/movies/Contraction_and_Convergence_Challen_et_al.flv
http://www.gci.org.uk/movies/Contraction_and_Convergence_Risk_Analysis_Sink_Failure.flv
http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/CPI.pdf
http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/C&C_Chapter_Levene_Book_.pdf
http://www.gci.org.uk/briefings/RSA_Occasional_Paper.pdf
http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/ASEF_.pdf
http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/Korea_C&C_Notes_for_Jeju_.pdf
http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/PIU.pdf
http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/UNEPFI_a.pdf
http://www.gci.org.uk/animations/BENN_C&C_Animation.exe
http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/Benn_DEFRA_15_11_07_.pdf
http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/ASEF_.pdf
http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/Korea_C&C_Notes_for_Jeju_.pdf
http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/PIU.pdf
http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/UNEPFI_a.pdf
This record is variously recognized: -
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_UN_Bodies.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_UK_Climate_Act.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_institutions.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_medics.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_religious.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_population.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_ethics.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_equity_fairness.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_sustainability.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_sceptics.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_campaigns.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_sociology.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_academia.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_capitalist_socialist.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_law.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_economists.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_politics.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_justice_eco_debt.html
http://www.gci.org.uk/endorsements_publications.html