
Tap . . . Bath . . . Plug-hole: - Just an ANALOGY
Water from the 'tap' [like our 'Green-House-Gas' or GHG emissions] flowing into . . '
the 'bath' [like the global atmosphere], raises the level of the bath-water [like the rate of atmosphere GHG accumulation/concentration] . . . but, the 'bath' is also drained by . . . the 'plug-hole' [like the natural 'sinks for GHG' . . . [affecting/slowing the rate of atmospheric GHG accumulation].
A simple and familiar 'stock-flow' animated model for
GHG emissions:atmosphere-concentrations.
To stop the bath over-flowing, the tap must turned off in the knowledge that the bath level will continue to rise while the tap is being turned off. This is true for emissions, once the need for UNFCCC-compliance in the form of safe and stable future GHG concentrations in the atmosphere is accepted.

An assessment of 'Contraction & Concentrations'
and 'Contraction &
Convergence' and the C&C targets and modelling behind
rates of
'sink-efficiency' in the UK Government's 'Climate Act' [2008].
The '50:50' odds the UK Government gave for avoiding a temperature rise
globally of more than two degrees with their emissions scenario are
examined
in this context. They are linked the Government's wholly unsubstantiated claim that atmosphere concentrations will fall after 2050 even though we are projected as only halfway through a 100-year emissions 'contraction-event'.
Presentation/Animation Download and save as a self-executing
PC file here & Mac file here
A letter 8th June 2011 from eminent persons
sent to the
UK
Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change about these matters is here

C&C in the context of COP-15 Copenhagen [12/2009]
with a view on what went wrong and what it takes to get it right.
Presentation/Animation - Also for 'download and save' as an swf file for internet browsers or a self-executing [virus-free] Flash file for PCs.

Presentation/Animation - C&C in the context of IPCC AR4 [2007] and the so-called
'coupled-carbon-cycle'
modelling
reported quantitatively for the first time since IPCC FAR 1990.
Essentially, due to 'positive feedback' effects in the carbon cycle, where rising temperature
amplifies the rate at which atmospheric GHG concentration increases, accelerated rates of
carbon emissions contraction are needed to meet a given concentration outcome. This is
the increasingly crucial issue of changing rates of 'Sink-efficiency'. In depth analysis of this
in relation to the UK Climate Act is here: -
Evidence to UK Environmental Audit Committee

At the RIBA Summit Venice in 2006, acontext-overview of 'risk' as: -
|
Acceptable [C1] Dangerous [C2] Impossible [C3], rates of C&C were animated in this
Presentation/Animation and also animated here and this supports the short article at: -
Climate Action book 2007 C&C which is discussed in more detail here: - C&C_Chapter_Levene_Book_.pdf

The rates for Contraction:Concentrations and Contraction:Convergence
are compared in this Animation as: -
Acceptable [C1] Dangerous [C2] Impossible [C3]
Rates of C&C
at four different theoretical rates of sink-failure.

Presentation/Animation [2002] that relates the arithmetic of emissions contraction to issues of: -
convergence, climate-
science, geo-technology, oil and gas depletion, growth and damages,
clean energy and implementation.

The arithmetic of emissions contraction relating to: -
Globalisation of Consciousness;
Climate Science – Rising Risks;
Economic Fundamentals;
'Efficiency' Revisited;
Trends of 'Expansion and Divergence';
'Contraction & Convergence';
'Syntax for Global Climate Policies';
Presentation/Animation and Notes

If, about future 'growth', you ask an economist 'how long is a piece of string', he may tell you a witty Woody Allen one-liner about infinity being a really long time, 'especially towards the end' - in other words he'll probably try and avoid the question.
If you ask a string-player how long is a piece of string, he'll probably say 'exactly twice half its length' as in the audio-visually animated image above. This is true because it has 'ontological structure'.